吕国英,苏娜,李茹,王智强. 基于CFN的汉语篇章连贯性研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2017, 31(5): 40-49.
LV Guoying, SU Na, LI Ru, WANG Zhiqiang. A Study on Chinese Discourse Coherence Based on CFN. , 2017, 31(5): 40-49.
A Study on Chinese Discourse Coherence Based on CFN
LV Guoying1, SU Na1, LI Ru1, 2, WANG Zhiqiang1
1.School of Computer & Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Computation Intelligence and Chinese Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China
Abstract：The research on discourse coherence is an important issue in discourse analysis. Based on Chinese FrameNet(CFN), this paper presents a coherence description scheme for Chinese discourse. It establishes the relationship between the frames and discourse units, and discusses the ways to achieve the discourse coherence by the frames and semantic relationships between frames. This provides a description mechanism and computation basis for discourse coherence. Annotations of 160 articles are selected from the People's Daily shows a more than 0.8 kappa value in both discourse structure annotation and discourse relation annotation. This proves that the proposed scheme guarantee a high consistent manual annotation, which is crucial to larger-scale discourse annotating.
[1] Crystal D. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1987. [2] Mitkov R. How could rhetorical relations be used in machine translation (and at least two open questions)? [C]//Proceedings of ACL Workshop on intentionality and structure in discourse relations. Morristown:Association for Computational Linguistics, 1993:86-89. [3] Santhosh S. Discourse based advancement on question answering system [J]. International Journal on Soft Computing, 2012:11. [4] Mann W C, Thompson S A. Rhetorical structure theory:toward a foundational theory of text organization [J]. Text, 1988, 8(3):243-281. [5] Carlson L, Marcu D. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory [C]//Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 2001. [6] Forbes K, Mihsakaki E, Prasad R, et al. D-LTAG System:Discourse parsing with a lexicalized treeadjoining grammar [J]. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2001, 12(3):261-279. [7] PDTB Research Group. The Penn discourse treebank 2. 0 annotation manual [R]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania, 2008. [8] 孙静, 李艳翠, 周围栋, 等. 汉语隐式篇章关系识别[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(1):111-117. [9] 张牧宇, 秦兵, 刘挺. 中文篇章级句间语义关系体系及标注[J]. 中文信息学报, 2014, 28(2):28-36. [10] 周强, 周骁聪. 基于话题链的汉语语篇连贯性描述体系[J]. 中文信息学报, 2014, 28(5):102-110. [11] 李天贤. 认知框架视角下的语篇连贯研究[D]. 浙江大学博士学位论文. 2012. [12] Fillmore C J. Frame semantics [M]//Linguistics in the Morning Calm, the Linguistic Society of Korea, Seoul:Hanshin. 1982:111-137. [13] 李茹. 汉语句子框架语义结构分析技术研究[D]. 山西大学博士学位论文. 2012. [14] 郝晓燕, 刘伟, 李茹, 等. 汉语框架语义知识库及软件描述体系[J]. 中文信息学报, 2007, 21(5):96-100. [15] Kinneavy J L. A Theory of discourse:the aim of discourse [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall International, 1971. [16] 黄国文. 语篇分析概要[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社, 1988. [17] 徐盛桓. 篇章:情景的组合[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 1990, 6:3-13. [18] 黄伯荣, 廖序东. 现代汉语[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2011. [19] 栾建安, 王纪宪, 苏炳华, 等. 多类别多评估者的kappa分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 1995, 12(6):20-22. [20] Daniel M, Estibaliz A, Magdelena R. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees [C]//Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, College Park MD, 1999:48-57.
2017, Vol. 31 
