焦点的韵律表达及认知加工研究综览

厚露莹,贾 媛

PDF(964 KB)
PDF(964 KB)
中文信息学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 12-20.
综述

焦点的韵律表达及认知加工研究综览

  • 厚露莹1,2,贾 媛1
作者信息 +

A Survey on Prosodic Expression and Cognitive Processing of Focus

  • HOU Luying1, 2, JIA Yuan1
Author information +
History +

摘要

焦点是语言学界广泛关注的问题。随着实验语音学与心理语言学的发展,国内外对焦点的韵律表达及认知加工方面的研究发展迅速,主要涉及焦点的语音与音系表征、焦点与重音的对应关系,以及句子理解中焦点加工与韵律加工的大脑机制等问题。该文从这一角度对相关研究进行回顾与总结,介绍该领域的发展状况及主要研究方向并提出见解和评论,以期对今后的研究有所启发。

Abstract

Focus is a general topic in linguistic study. Along with the development of experimental phonetics and psycholinguistics, research on the prosodic expression and cognitive processing of focus develops rapidly. The stu-dies mainly deal with the following three perspectives: the phonetic and phonological expression of focus, the relationship of focus and accent, as well as the processing and the brain mechanism of focus and prosody in sentence comprehension. This paper reviews the methodology and results of relative studies and discusses the existing problems, with the aim to shed a light on further research.

关键词

焦点 / 重音 / 韵律加工 / 事件相关电位

Key words

focus / accent / prosodic processing / event-related potentials

引用本文

导出引用
厚露莹,贾 媛. 焦点的韵律表达及认知加工研究综览. 中文信息学报. 2014, 28(4): 12-20
HOU Luying, JIA Yuan. A Survey on Prosodic Expression and Cognitive Processing of Focus. Journal of Chinese Information Processing. 2014, 28(4): 12-20

参考文献

[1] Cruttenden A. Intonation [M]. Avon: Cambridge University Press. 1986.
[2] Johnson S M, Clifton C, Breen M, et al. An ERP investigation of prosodic and semantic focus [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Suppl. 174), 2003, E157.
[3] Stolterfoht B, Friederici A D, Alter K, et al. Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading Differential ERP effects [J]. Cognition, 2007, 104: 565-590.
[4] Chomsky N. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation [C]//Steinberg, D., Jakobovits, L. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971: 183-216.
[5] Cinque G. A null theory of phrase and compound stress [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1993, 18: 239-297.
[6] Erteschik-Shir N. The dynamics of focus structure [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997.
[7] Halliday M A K. Notes on transitivity and theme in English [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, 3: 199-244.
[8] Jackendoff R. Semantic Structures [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1990.
[9] Lambrecht K. Information structure and sentence form: A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
[10] Birch S, Clifton C. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension [J]. Language and Speech, 1995, 38(4): 365-391.
[12] Dahan D, Tanenhaus M K, Chambers C G. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2002, 47: 292-314.
[13] Birch S, Clifton, Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2002, 47(4): 571-588.
[13] Birch S, Clifton C. Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2000, 47: 571-588.
[14] Ladd D R. Intonational Phonology [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996.
[15] Gussenhoven C G. Testing the reality of focus domains [J]. Language and Speech, 1983, 26: 61-80.
[16] Gussenhoven C G. Sentence accents and argument structure [C]//Roca, I. M. Thematic structure: Its role in grammar. Berlin, New York: Foris, 1992: 79-106.
[17] Gussenhoven C G. On the Limits of Focus Projection in English [C]//Bosch, P., van der Sandt, R. Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 43-55.
[18] Haider H, Rosengren I. Scrambling - non-triggered chain formation in OV-languages [J]. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 2003, 15: 203-267.
[19] Reinhart T. Interface strategies [M]. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Research Institute for Language and Speech. 1995.
[20] Selkirk E O. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure [M]. Cambridge: MIT press. 1984.
[21] Selkirk E O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing[C]//Goldsmith, J. Handbook of phonological theory. London: Blackwell, 1995: 550-569.
[22] 陈虎.自然语言的重音分布及其语义解释——西方研究综述[J]. 现代外语(季刊), 2003, 26(1): 93-103.
[23] Terken J, Nooteboom S G. Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for given and new information [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1987, 2: 145-163.
[24] Hruska C, Alter K, Steinhauer K, et al. Misleading dialogues: Humans brain reaction to prosodic information [C]//Cavé, Ch., Guatella, I., Santi, S. Orality and Gestures. Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication. Provence, France: Harmattan, 2001: 425-430.
[25] Hruska C, Alter K, Steinhauer K, et al. Can wrong prosodic information be mistaken by the brain? [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Suppl. 122), 2000, E82.
[26] Hruska C. Einflüsse kontextueller und prosodischer Informationen in der auditorischen Satzverar beitung: Untersuchungen mit ereigniskorrelierten Hirnpotentialen [M]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences(MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences 48). 2004.
[27] Ito K, Garnsey S M. Brain Responses to Focus-Related Prosodic Mismatch in Japanese [J]. Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan 3, 2004, 23-26.
[28] Ni W, Crain S, Shankweiler D. Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1996, 11(3): 283-334.
[29] Sedivy J C. Invoking discourse-based contrast sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2002, 46: 341-370.
[30] Paterson K B, Liversedge S P, Underwood G. The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1999, 52A (3): 717-737.
[31] Cowles H W. Processing information structure: evidence from comprehension and production [D]. San Diego, CA: University of California, 2003.
[32] Cowles H W, Kluender R, Kutas M, et al. 2007. Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions [J]. Brain and Language, 2003, 102: 228-242.
[33] Bader M, Meng M. Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: an across-the-board comparison [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1999, 28: 121-143.
[34] Bornkessel I, Schlesewsky M, Friederici A D. Contextual Information Modulates Initial Processes of Syntactic Integration: The Role of Inter- versus Intrasentential Predictions [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2003, 29(5): 871-882.
[35] Stolterfoht B, Bader M. Focus structure and the processing of word order variations in German[C]//Steube, A. Information Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Berlin: deGruyter, 2004: 259-275.
[36] Stolterfoht B. Processing word order variations and ellipses: the interplay of syntax and information structure during sentence comprehension [M]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences 55). 2005.
[37] Bader M. Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences[C]//Fodor J.D., Ferreira F. Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998: 1-46.
[38] Xu Y. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours [J]. Journal of Phonetics, 1999, 27: 55-105.
[39] 贾媛, 熊子瑜, 李爱军. 普通话焦点重音对语句音高的作用[R]. Report of Phonetic Research, Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2006: 61-68.
[40] Jia Y, Xiong Zy, Li Aj. Phonetic and Phonological Analysis of Focal Accents of Disyllabic Words in Standard Chinese (ABSTRACT)[R]. Report of Phonetic Research, Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2006: 119-130.
[41] Chen Y. Durational adjustment under corrective focus in Standard Chinese [J]. Journal of Phonetics, 2006, 34: 176-201.
[42] 贾媛, 李爱军, 陈轶亚. 普通话五字组焦点音高和时长分布模式研究[J]. 语言文字应用, 2008, 4: 53-61.
[43] 贾媛, 马秋武, 李爱军. 普通话五字组焦点时长分布模式研究[J]. Report of Phonetic Research, 2007, 86-90.
[44] 黄彩玉. 一类“都”字歧义句的实验语音学分析[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 31(5): 141-144.
[45] 贾媛, 李爱军, 陈轶亚. 汉语 “是” 和 “连”标记的焦点成分语音特征的研究[R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2009, 22-28.
[46] 王蓓, Caroline Féry.话题和焦点在分裂句中的韵律编码方式及其对感知的影响[J]. 声学学报, 2010, 35(6): 694-700.
[47] Jia Y, Li Aj. Interaction of Syntax-marked Focusand Wh-question Induced Focus in Standard Chinese [R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2010: 39-42.
[48] 陈肖霞, 华武. 对焦点重音位置上语音变化的研究[R], Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2005: 34-37.
[49] 刘探宙. 多重强式焦点共现句式[J]. 中国语文, 2008, 3: 259-269.
[50] 莫静,清云梅,杨玉芳. 多重强式焦点共现句中焦点强度的语音感知差异[J]. 汉语学习, 2010, 1: 18-25.
[51] Jia Y, Li Aj. Acoustic Manifestations of Information Categories in Standard Chinese [R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2009: 57-62.
[52] Jia Y, Li Aj, Xiong Zy. A Phonetic and Phonological Analysis of Dual and Multiple Focuses In Standard Chinese [R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2010, 57-62.
[53] 贾媛, 李爱军. 论普通话重音的层级性——基于语音事实的分析[R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2010. 10-19.
[54] Jia Y, Xiong Zy, Li Aj. Narrow Focus Patterns of Disyllabic Words with Different Morphosyntactic Structures in Standard Chinese (ABSTRACT)[R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2006: 131-134.
[55] 王韫佳, 初敏, 贺琳. 汉语焦点重音和语义重音分布的初步实验研究[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2006, 2: 86-98.
[56] Jia Y, Li Aj, Xiong Zy. Intonational prominence of "Shi...(De)"construction [R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2008: 161-165.
[57] 贾媛, 李爱军, 马秋武, 熊子瑜. 具有焦点标记作用的“是”字句重音分布研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2009, 23(3): 103-109.
[58] Jia Y, Li Aj. Relation between Focus and Accent in Standard Chinese [R]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Report of Phonetic Research, 2010: 43-47.
[59] 曹文. 对普通话同构异焦句的重音和句尾的初步研究[C].赵金铭. 对外汉语教学的全方位探索——对外汉语研究学术讨论会论文集. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005: 210-223.
[60] 曹文. 汉语焦点重音的韵律实现: 普通话同文异焦句的实验研究[M]. 北京语言大学出版社. 2010.

基金

国家973计划(2013CB329301);中国社会科学院创新工程项目
PDF(964 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/