逻辑补足义是指附加在以谓词为中心的基本命题成分之上的否定、程度、时体、模态和语气等, 具体表现为逻辑语义算子对谓词的语义约束关系,是基本命题成分所表达语义关系的有效补充。在句子中,逻辑补足义所表达的语义是句子深度语义理解的重要层面。该文以深层语义理解为目标,在逻辑补足义已有的研究基础上,建立了否定、程度、时体和语气分类体系,构建了相应的算子词典;制定标注规范,对已经标注了基本命题义语义角色的句子进行各类逻辑补足义的标注;最后,对标注的结果进行统计并对标注过程中出现的问题进行了分析。
Abstract
Logical complement semantics is referred to as the meaning expressed by elements of negation, degree, tense and aspect, modality and mood that are attached to a basic predicate-centered proposition in a sentence. It is embodied as the semantic constraint relation between logical semantic operators and the predicate. Logical complement semantics as an effective supplement of semantic relations expressed by elements in a basic proposition is important for deep understanding of sentence semantics. This paper proposes a Chinese logical complement semantic annotation framework for deep semantic understanding. Specifically, classification systems and operator dictionaries are constructed for representing negation, degree, tense and aspect, and mood based on existing research results. Annotation rules are established to annotate logic complement semantics for the sentences which have been tagged for basic propositional arguments. Finally, the statistics of annotation results is presented, and the problems in annotation process are also analyzed.
关键词
逻辑补足义 /
否定 /
程度 /
时体 /
语气 /
标注框架
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
logical complement semantics /
negation /
degree /
tense and aspect /
mood /
annotation framework
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Zhang K L, et al. Study on Chinese modality tagging framework[C]//Proceeding of Chinese Lexical Semantics(LNAI10085),2016:291-305.
[2] 于康. 命题内成分与命题外成分——以汉语助动词为例[J]. 世界汉语教学, 1996(1):27-34.
[3] 陈昌来. 论现代汉语句子的语义结构[J]. 鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2000(1):67-72,77.
[4] 张黎. 汉语句子的语义结构[J]. 北方论丛, 1995(5):54-60.
[5] 鲁川.语言的主观信息和汉语的情态标记[A].语法研究与探索(十二)[G].北京:商务印书馆,2003:317-330.
[6] Pustejovsky J, et al. TimeML: Robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text[C]//Proceedings of the IWCS-5 Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics,2003.
[7] Pustejovsky J, et al. The timebank corpus[C]//Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics,2003:647-656.
[8] Banarescu L, et al. Abstract meaning representation for sembanking[C]//Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse,2013:178-186.
[9] Li B, et al. Annotating the little prince with Chinese AMRs[C]//Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop Held in Conjunction with ACL,2016:7-15.
[10] 李斌, 等. 融合概念对齐信息的中文AMR语料库的构建[J]. 中文信息学报, 2017, 31(6):93-102.
[11] 曲维光, 等. 自然语言句子抽象语义表示AMR研究综述[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2017, 32(1):26-36.
[12] 袁毓林. 信息抽取的语义知识资源研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2002, 16(5):10-16.
[13] 袁毓林. 用逻辑和篇章知识来约束模板匹配——逻辑结构和篇章结构知识在信息抽取中的运用[J]. 中文信息学报, 2005, 19(4):40-46.
[14] 袁毓林. 论否定句的焦点、预设和辖域歧义[J]. 中国语文, 2000(2):99-108.
[15] Lee P L, Pan H H. The Chinese negation marker Bu and its association with focus[J]. Linguistics, 2001, 39(4): 703-731.
[16] 李宝伦,潘海华. 焦点与汉语否定和量词的相互作用. 徐烈炯,潘海华, 焦点结构和意义研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社,2005: 208-233.
[17] 沈家煊. 不对称和标记论[M]. 南昌:江西教育出版社,1999.
[18] 张谊生.现代汉语虚词探索[M].上海:学林出版社,2004.
[19] 蔺璜, 郭姝慧. 程度副词的特点范围与分类[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 26(2):71-74.
[20] 石毓智. 论汉语的进行体范畴[J]. 汉语学习, 2006(3):14-24.
[21] Comrie B. Aspect[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1976.
[22] 孙汝建. 句末语气词的四种语用功能[J]. 南通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 21(2):76-80.
[23] Zan H Y, et al. Research on the Chinese function word usage knowledge base[J]. International Journal on Asian Language Processing, 2011, 21(4):185-198.
[24] 张坤丽,等.现代汉语虚词用法知识库建设综述[J].中文信息学报,2015,29(3):1-8.
[25] 俞士汶,等.现代汉语语法信息词典详解[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998.
[26] Zhan W D. Peking University Treebank[M]. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Volume 3. General Editor Rint Sybesma. Netherlands: Brill Publishing House, 2016:332-336.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2014CB340504);国家自然科学基金(61402419,60970083);国家社会科学基金(14BYY096);计算语言学教育部重点实验室开放课题项目;河南省科技厅科技攻关项目(172102210478)
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(3631 KB)
