汉语谐音与语义双关语的认知神经加工差异——ERP证据

杨思琴,徐文玉,江铭虎,张骁晨

PDF(3911 KB)
PDF(3911 KB)
中文信息学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 1-9.
语言分析与计算

汉语谐音与语义双关语的认知神经加工差异——ERP证据

  • 杨思琴1,徐文玉1,江铭虎1,张骁晨2
作者信息 +

The Difference of Cognitive Processing Between Phonetic Puns and Semantic Puns in Chinese: An ERP Evidence

  • YANG Siqin1, XU Wenyu1, JIANG Minghu1, ZHANG Xiaochen2
Author information +
History +

摘要

该文运用事件相关电位技术,观测汉语谐音双关语与语义双关语两者是否存在认知神经加工上的差异。结果发现,语义双关语的正确率明显低于谐音双关语以及不符合逻辑语篇的正确率。谐音双关语组、语义双关语组和不合逻辑语篇引发的脑电波数据在300~900ms之间存在显著差异。其中,语义双关语和不合逻辑语篇都引发了N400效应。脑电波形图和脑电波地形图显示,前者引发的N400效应略微晚于后者引发的N400效应,但数据统计的结果不显著。在600~900ms,谐音双关语引发了P600效应。研究由此推论: 汉语谐音双关语与语义双关语认知层面的加工差异与双关语的呈现形式和表达效果密切相关。

Abstract

This study uses ERPs to explore the cognitive processing difference between phonetic puns and semantic puns in Chinese. The results show that semantic puns' accuracy is apparently lower than phonetic puns' and illogical discourses. The EEG data between 300ms and 900ms triggered by phonetic puns, semantic puns and illogical discourses are significantly different, both semantic puns and illogical discourses triggered N400. The EEG Mapping shows that the N400 triggered by semantic puns appeared slightly later than triggered by illogical discourses. As for 600ms and 900ms, phouefic puns triggered P600. It is concluded that the cognitive processing difference between phonetic puns and semantic puns in Chinese tends to be related to punspresentation and expressing effect.

关键词

双关语 / N400 / P600

Key words

pun / N400 / P600

引用本文

导出引用
杨思琴,徐文玉,江铭虎,张骁晨. 汉语谐音与语义双关语的认知神经加工差异——ERP证据. 中文信息学报. 2020, 34(1): 1-9
YANG Siqin, XU Wenyu, JIANG Minghu, ZHANG Xiaochen. The Difference of Cognitive Processing Between Phonetic Puns and Semantic Puns in Chinese: An ERP Evidence. Journal of Chinese Information Processing. 2020, 34(1): 1-9

参考文献

[1] 李国南.英语中的双关语[J]. 外国语, 1986,(4): 56-62.
[2] 陈望道.修辞学发凡[M].上海: 上海教育出版社,2001.
[3] 艾琳.英汉双关的认知语用研究[M].上海: 上海外国语大学出版社,2007.
[4] 陆谷孙.英汉大词典[M].上海: 上海译文出版社,2007.
[5] 姚乃强.柯林斯高阶英汉双解词典[M].北京: 商务印书馆,2008.
[6] 唐桂兰.现代汉语修辞艺术[M].合肥: 合肥工业大学出版社,2008.
[7] 姚吉刚.英汉双关语分类对比研究[J].西南科技大学学报,2014,1.
[8] 钟玖英.从语法角度论析双关[J].修辞学习,2001,2.
[9] Cheng-Tzung L.An analysis of puns in Chinese and English advertising headlines[D].MAdiss., Providence University,1998.
[10] 王小璐,郑伟.双关语的语义通达模型及其认知神经加工特征[J].浙江大学学报,2019,49(2): 115-128.
[11] Coulson S, Severens E. Hemispheric asymmetry and pun comprehension: When cowboys have sore calves[J].Brain and Language,2007, 100(2): 172-187.
[12] Sheridan H,Reingold E M,Daneman M. Using puns to study contextual influences on lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements[J].Psychonomic Buletin & Review,2009,16(5): 875-881.
[13] Kana R K,Wadsworth H M.The archeologists carer ended in ruins: Hemispheric diferences in pun comprehension in autism[J] Neuroimage,2012, 62 (1): 77-86.
[14] Benjamin R S, Katharina S, Abdel R R, et al. Listening to puns elicits the co-activation of alternative homophone meanings during language production[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015,10(6): e0130853.
[15] Dholakia A,Meade G,Coch D. The N400 elicited by homonyms in puns: Two primes are not beter than one[J].Psychophysiology,2016,53(12): 1799-1810.
[16] Tara M,Lori,B.Pun processing from a psycholinguistic perspective: Introducing the model of psycholinguistic hemispheric incongruity laughter (M.PHIL) [J]. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body,Brain and Cognition, 2016, 21 (4-6): 1-29.
[17] Debra J,Sarah B. Reading homophone puns: Evidence from eye tracking[J].Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,2017, 71(1): 2-13.
[18] Kutas M,Hillyard S.Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity[J].Science,1980, 207: 203-205.
[19] Kutas, M, Van Petten C. Psycholinguistics electri Wed[M]//In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.1994: 83-143.
[20] Alexander M R,Barbara W.Nonliteral language in alzheimer dementia: A review[J].Journal of the International Neuropsychogical Society,2011,17(2): 207-218.
[21] Pynte J,Besson M,Robichon F H,et al.The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study[J].Brain and Language, 1996, 55(3): 293-316.
[22] Coulson S,Kutas M.Getting it: Human event-related brain response in good and poor comprehenders[J].Neuroscience Letters,2001,316: 71-74.
[23] Harris T,Wexler K,Holcomb P.An ERP investigation of binding and coreference[J]. Brain and Language, 2000, 75(3): 313-346.
[24] Ainsworth-darnell K,Shulman H G, Boland J E.Dissociating brain response to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials[J].Journal of Memory and Language,1998,38(1): 112-130.
[25] Kolk H H J,Chwilla D J.Late positivities in unusual situations[J].Brain and Language,2007,100: 257-262.
[26] Kolk H H,Chwilla D J, Van H M, et al. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials[J]. Brain and Language, 2003, 85(1): 1-36.
[27] Kuperberg G R, Sitnikova T, Caplan D,et al. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences[J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 2003, 17(1): 117-129.
[28] Bornkessel I,Schlesewsky M.The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages[J]. Psychological Review, 2006, 113(4): 787-821.
[29] Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I, Schlesewsky M.An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension[J]. Brain Research Reviews, 2008, 59(1): 55-73.
[30] 王瑞乐,李妮,陈宝国.句子加工中的语义P600效应[J].心理科学进展, 2010,18(4): 545-552.
[31] 约翰·肖内西,尤金·泽克迈斯特,珍妮·泽克迈斯特. 心理学研究方法[M].北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2010.
[32] 肖航.语料库在线[EB/OL].http://www.cncorpus.org/index.aspx.
[33] 曾祥炎. E-Prime 实验设计技术[M].北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2014.
[34] 陈宝国,王立新,彭聃龄.高、低频汉字形音义激活的时间进程[J].心理与行为研究,2006, 4(4): 252-257.
[35] 郭桃梅,彭聃龄,祁志强,等.语音的自动激活及其在汉字中的通达作用[J].心理学探新, 2004,24(1): 31-33.

基金

国家自然科学基金(61433015);国家社会科学基金(14ZDB154,15ZDB017)
PDF(3911 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/