[1] 焦李成. 下一代人工智能的挑战与思考[J]. 智能系统学报, 2020, 15(06): 1185-1187.
[2] Roll I, Wylie R. Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26(2): 582-599.
[3] Fuchs L S, Fuchs D, Hamlett C L, et al. Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement: Using a reading maze task[J]. Exceptional Children, 1992, 58(5): 436-450.
[4] Hontangas P, Ponsoda V, Olea J, et al. The choice of item difficulty in self-adapted testing[J]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2000, 16(1): 3.
[5] Liu S, Zhang X, Zhang S, et al. Neural machine reading comprehension: Methods and trends[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019,9(18): 3698.
[6] Zhang D, Wang L, Zhang L, et al. The gap of semantic parsing: A survey on automatic math word problem solvers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, 42(9): 2287-2305.
[7] Ke Z, Ng V. Automatedessay scoring: A survey of the state of the art[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 6300-6308.
[8] 黄振亚. 面向个性化学习的数据挖掘方法与应用研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学博士学位论文, 2020.
[9] Wu F, Qiao Y, Chen J H, et al. Mind: A large-scale dataset for news recommendation[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 3597-3606.
[10] Xu G, Meng Y, Qiu X, et al. Sentiment analysis of comment texts based on BiLSTM[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 51522-51532.
[11] Huang W, Chen E, Liu Q, et al. Hierarchical multi-label text classification: An attention-based recurrent network approach[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2019: 1051-1060.
[12] Liu Q, Huang Z, Huang Z, et al. Finding similar exercises in online education systems[C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,2018: 1821-1830.
[13] Liu Q, Tong S, Liu C, et al. Exploiting cognitive structure for adaptive learning[C]//Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019: 627-635.
[14] Huang Z, Liu Q, Chen E, et al. Question difficulty prediction for READING problems in standard tests[C]//Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017: 1352-1359.
[15] Qiu Z, Wu X, Fan W. Question difficulty prediction for multiple choice problems in medical exams[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2019: 139-148.
[16] Xue K, Yaneva V, Runyon C, et al. Predicting the difficulty and response time of multiple choice questions using transfer learning[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 2020: 193-197.
[17] Yin Y, Liu Q, Huang Z, et al. Quesnet: A unified representation for heterogeneous test questions[C]//Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019: 1328-1336.
[18] 黄仔. 基于多模态学习的试题建模方法与应用研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学博士学位论文, 2019.
[19] Pelnek R. Measuring similarity of educational items: An overview[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2019, 13(2): 354-366.
[20] Rihk J, Pelnek R. Measuring similarity of educational items using data on learners' performance[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 2017: 16-23.
[21] 刘淇, 陈恩红, 朱天宇, 等. 面向在线智慧学习的教育数据挖掘技术研究[J]. 模式识别与人工智能, 2018, 31(01): 77-90.
[22] Liu Q, Huang Z, Yin Y, et al. Ekt: Exercise-aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2019, 33(1): 100-115.
[23] Hermann K M, Kocisky T, Grefenstette E, et al. Teaching machines to read and comprehend[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015, 28: 1693-1701.
[24] Hill F, Bordes A, Chopra S, et al. The goldilocks principle: Reading children's books with explicit memory representations[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02301, 2015.
[25] Suster S, Daelemans W. CLICR: A dataset of clinical case reports for machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,2018: 1551-1563.
[26] Richardson M, Burges C J C, Renshaw E. MCtest: A challenge dataset for the open-domain machine comprehension of text[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2013: 193-203.
[27] Lai G, Xie Q, Liu H, et al. RACE: Large-scale reading comprehension dataset from examinations[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2017: 785-794.
[28] Rajpurkar P, Zhang J, Lopyrev K, et al. SQuAd: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,2016: 2383-2392.
[29] Trischler A, Wang T, Yuan X, et al. NewsQA: A machine comprehension dataset[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP, 2017: 191-200.
[30] Joshi M, Choi E, Weld D S, et al. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 1601-1611.
[31] Saha A, Aralikatte R, Khapra M M, et al. DuoRC: Towards complex language understanding with paraphrased reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018: 1683-1693.
[32] Cui Y, Liu T, Che W, et al. Aspan-extraction dataset for Chinese machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2019: 5883-5889.
[33] Bajaj P, Campos D, Craswell N, et al. MSMARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09268, 2016.
[34] Koc^isk T, Schwarz J, Blunsom P, et al. The narrativeQA reading comprehension challenge[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018, 6: 317-328.
[35] Dunn M, Sagun L, Higgins M, et al. SearchQA: A new q&a dataset augmented with context from a search engine[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05179, 2017.
[36] He W, Liu K, Liu J, et al. DuReader: A Chinese machine reading comprehension dataset from real-world applications[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering, 2018: 37-46.
[37] Huang D, Shi S, Lin C Y, et al. How well do computers solve math word problems?Large-scale dataset construction and evaluation[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 887-896.
[38] Wang Y, Liu X, Shi S. Deep neural solver for math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2017: 845-854.
[39] Koncel-Kedziorski R, Roy S, Amini A, et al. MAWPS: A math word problem repository[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2016: 1152-1157.
[40] Amini A, Gabriel S, Lin S, et al. MathQA: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based formalisms[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2019: 2357-2367.
[41] Miao S Y, Liang C C, Su K Y. Adiverse corpus for evaluating and developing English math word problem solvers[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 975-984.
[42] Saxton D, Grefenstette E, Hill F, et al. Analysing mathematical reasoning abilities of neural models[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01557, 2019.
[43] Yannakoudakis H, Briscoe T, Medlock B. A new dataset and method for automatically grading ESOL texts[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2011: 180-189.
[44] Dzikovska M O, Nielsen R, Brew C, et al. Semeval-2013 task 7: The joint student response analysis and 8th recognizing textual entailment challenge[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 2013: 263-274.
[45] Blanchard D, Tetreault J, Higgins D, et al. TOEFL11: A corpus of non-native English[J/OL]. ETS Research Report Series, 2013,(2): 1-15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02331.x[2022-07-18].
[46] Lin X, Huang Z, Zhao H, et al. Hms: A hierarchical solver with dependency-enhanced understanding for math word problem[C]//Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021: 4232-4240.
[47] Alagumalai S, Curtis D D. Classical test theory[M].Dordrecht: Springer, 2005: 1-14.
[48] DiBello L V, Roussos L A, Stout W. Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models[J]. Handbook of Statistics, 2006, 26:970-1030.
[49] Beck J, Stern M, Woolf B P. Using the student model to control problem difficulty[C]//Proceedings of the User Modeling, 1997: 277-288.
[50] Kubinger K D, Gottschall C H. Item difficulty of multiple choice tests dependant on different item response formats-an experiment in fundamental research on psychological assessment[J]. Psychology Science, 2007, 49(4): 361.
[51] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. Bert: Pretraining of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2019: 4171-4186.
[52] Huang Z, Lin X, Wang H, et al. DisenQNet: Disentangled representation learning for educational questions[C]//Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2021: 696-704.
[53] Lehnert W G. The process of question answering[D]. PhD diss., New Haven: Yale University, 1977.
[54] Hirschman L, Light M, Breck E, et al. Deep read: A reading comprehension system[C]//Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1999: 325-332.
[55] Sachan M, Dubey K, Xing E, et al. Learning answer-entailing structures for machine comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2015: 239-249.
[56] Narasimhan K, Barzilay R. Machine comprehension with discourse relations[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2015: 1253-1262.
[57] Wang H, Bansal M, Gimpel K, et al. Machine comprehension with syntax, frames, and semantics[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2015: 700-706.
[58] Berant J, Srikumar V, Chen P C, et al. Modeling biological processes for reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014: 1499-1510.
[59] Chen D, Fisch A, Weston J, et al. Reading wikipedia to answer open-domain questions[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 1870-1879.
[60] Seo M, Kembhavi A, Farhadi A, et al. Bidirectional attention flow for machine comprehension[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01603, 2016.
[61] Cui Y, Chen Z, Wei S, et al. Attention-over-attention neural networks for reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 593-602.
[62] Wang W, Yang N, Wei F, et al. Gated self-matching networks for reading comprehension and question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 189-198.
[63] Pan B, Li H, Zhao Z, et al. Memen: Multi-layer embedding with memory networks for machine comprehension[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09098, 2017.
[64] Zheng B, Wen H, Liang Y, et al. Document modeling with graph attention networks for multi-grained machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 6708-6718.
[65] Radford A, Wu J, Child R, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners[J/OL]. OpenAI Blog, 2019, 1(8): 9. https://cdn.openai.com/better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf[2022-07-18].
[66] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 5998-6008.
[67] Li H, Zhang X, Liu Y, et al. D-net: A pre-training and fine-tuning framework for improving the generalization of machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering, 2019: 212-219.
[68] Cui Y, Che W, Liu T, et al. Cross-lingual machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2019: 1586-1595.
[69] Gong H, Shen Y, Yu D, et al. Recurrent chunking mechanisms for long-text machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 6751-6761.
[70] Luo H, Li S W, Yu S, et al. Cooperative learning of zero-shot machine reading comprehension[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.07449, 2021.
[71] Kadlec R, Schmid M, Bajgar O, et al. Text understanding with the attention sum reader network[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 908-918.
[72] Dhingra B, Liu H, Yang Z, et al. Gated-attention readers for text comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 1832-1846.
[73] Xu Y, Liu J, Gao J, et al. Dynamic fusion networks for machine reading comprehension[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04964, 2017.
[74] Wang S, Jiang J. Machine comprehension using match-lstm and answer pointer[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07905, 2016.
[75] Xiong C, Zhong V, Socher R. Dynamic coattention networks for question answering[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01604, 2016.
[76] Shen Y, Huang P S, Gao J, et al. Reasonet: Learning to stop reading in machine comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2017: 1047-1055.
[77] Yu S, Indurthi S R, Back S, et al. A multi-stage memory augmented neural network for machine reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering, 2018: 21-30.
[78] Chen D. Neural reading comprehension and beyond[D]. PhD diss., San Francisco: Stanford University, 2018.
[79] Fletcher C R. Understanding and solving arithmetic word problems: a computer simulation[J]. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 1985, 17(5): 565-571.
[80] Yuhui M, Ying Z, Guangzuo C, et al. Frame-based calculus of solving arithmetic multi-step addition and subtraction word problems[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, 2010: 476-479.
[81] Mukherjee A, Garain U. A review of methods for automatic understanding of natural language mathematical problems[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2008, 29(2): 93-122.
[82] Hosseini M J, Hajishirzi H, Etzioni O, et al. Learning to solve arithmetic word problems with verb categorization[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014: 523-533.
[83] Liang C C, Wong Y S, Lin Y C, et al. A meaning-based statistical English math word problem solver[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2018: 652-662.
[84] Roy S, Roth D. Solving general arithmetic word problems[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2015: 1743-1752.
[85] Wang L, Zhang D, Gao L, et al. Mathdqn: Solving arithmetic word problems via deep reinforcement learning[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 5545-5552.
[86] Wang L, Zhang D, Zhang J, et al. Template-based math word problem solvers with recursive neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 7144-7151.
[87] Li J, Wang L, Zhang J, et al. Modeling intra-relation in math word problems with different functional multi-head attentions[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 6162-6167.
[88] Xie Z, Sun S. A goal-driven tree-structured neural model for math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 5299-5305.
[89] Zhang J, Wang L, Lee R K W, et al. Graph-to-tree learning for solving math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 3928-3937.
[90] Wu Q, Zhang Q, Fu J, et al. A knowledge-aware sequence-to-tree network for math word problem solving[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2020: 7137-7146.
[91] Shen Y, Jin C. Solving math word problems with multi-encoders and multi-decoders[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2020: 2924-2934.
[92] Cao Y, Hong F, Li H, et al. A bottom-up DAG structure extraction model for math word problems [C]//Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021: 39-46.
[93] Qin J, Liang X, Hong Y, et al. Neural-symbolic solver for math word problems with auxiliary tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2021: 5870-5881.
[94] Wu Q, Zhang Q, Wei Z, et al. Math word problem solving with explicit numerical values[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2021: 5859-5869.
[95] Huang S, Wang J, Xu J, et al. Recall and learn: A memory-augmented solver for math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021: 786-796.
[96] Liang Z, Zhang J, Shao J, et al. Mwp-bert: A strong baseline for math word problems[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13435, 2021.
[97] Kim H, Hwang J, Yoo T, et al. Improving a graph-to-tree model for solving math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, 2022: 1-7.
[98] Shen J, Yin Y, Li L, et al. Generate and rank: A multi-task framework for math word problems[C]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021: 2269-2279.
[99] Roy S, Roth D. Unit dependency graph and its application to arithmetic word problem solving[C]//Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017: 3082-3088.
[100] Huang Z, Liu Q, Gao W, et al. Neural mathematical solver with enhanced formula structure[C]//Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2020: 1729-1732.
[101] 付瑞吉, 王栋, 王士进, 等. 面向作文自动评分的优美句识别[J]. 中文信息学报, 2018, 32(06): 88-97.
[102] 何屹松, 孙媛媛, 张凯, 等. 计算机智能辅助评分系统定标集选取和优化方法研究[J]. 中国考试, 2020(01): 30-36.
[103] Page E B. The imminence of grading essays by computer[J]. The Phi Delta Kappan, 1966, 47(5): 238-243.
[104] Yannakoudakis H, Briscoe T. Modeling coherence in ESOL learner texts[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, 2012: 33-43.
[105] Farra N, Somasundaran S, Burstein J. Scoring persuasive essays using opinions and their targets[C]//Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 2015: 64-74.
[106] Chen H, He B. Automated essay scoring by maximizing human-machine agreement[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2013: 1741-1752.
[107] Taghipour K, Ng H T. A neural approach to automated essay scoring[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2016: 1882-1891.
[108] Dong F, Zhang Y. Automatic features for essay scoring: an empirical study[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2016: 1072-1077.
[109] Dong F, Zhang Y, Yang J. Attention-based recurrent convolutional neural network for automatic essay scoring[C]//Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 2017: 153-162.
[110] Tay Y, Phan M, Tuan L A, et al. Skipflow: incorporating neural coherence features for end-to-end automatic text scoring[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018: 5948-5955.
[111] Lun J, Zhu J, Tang Y, et al. Multiple data augmentation strategies for improving performance on automatic short answer scoring[C]//Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 13389-13396.
[112] Liu J, Xu Y, Zhu Y. Automated essay scoring based on two-stage learning[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07744, 2019.
[113] Nadeem F, Nguyen H, Liu Y, et al. Automated essay scoring with discourse-aware neural models[C]//Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 2019: 484-493.
[114] Yang R, Cao J, Wen Z, et al. Enhancing automated essay scoring performance via fine-tuning pre-trained language models with combination of regression and ranking[C]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 1560-1569.
[115] Wang Y, Wang C, Li R, et al. On the use of BERT for automated essay scoring: joint learning of multi-scale essay representation[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03835, 2022.
[116] Wu J, Yang Y, Deng C, et al. Sogou machine reading comprehension toolkit[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11848, 2019.
[117] Lan Y, Wang L, Zhang Q, et al. Mwptoolkit: An open-source framework for deep learning-based math word problem solvers[C]//Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022: 13188-13190.
[118] Zesch T, Horbach A.Escrito: An NLP-enhanced educational scoring toolkit[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2018: 2310-2316.
[119] Wang X, Huang W, Liu Q, et al. Fine-grained similarity measurement between educational videos and exercises[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2020: 331-339.
[120] Chen P, Lu Y, Zheng V W, et al. Knowedu: A system to construct knowledge graph for education[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 31553-31563.
[121] Pan L, Li C, Li J, et al. Prerequisite relation learningfor concepts in MOOCS[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 1447-1456.
[122] Huang X, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. Constructing educational concept maps with multiple relationships from multi-source data[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2019: 1108-1113.