[1] 最高人民法院. 《2020年最高人民法院工作报告》[R],2021.
[2] Hu Z, Li X, Tu C, et al.Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2018: 487-498.
[3] Zhong H, Wang Y, Tu C, et al. Iteratively questioning and answering for interpretable legal judgment prediction[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 1250-1257.
[4] Bruckschen M, Northfleet C, Silva D, et al. Named entity recognition in the legal domain for ontology population[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts, 2010: 16.
[5] Zhang N, Pu Y, Yang S, et al. An ontological Chinese legal consultation system [J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 18250-18261.
[6] Cardellino C, Teruel M, Alemany L, et al. Legal NERC with ontologies, Wikipedia and curriculum learning[C]//Proceedings of the 15th European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 254-259.
[7] Wang Z, Wu Y, Lei P, et al. Named entity recognition method of brazilian legal text based on pre-training model [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1550: 032149.
[8] Christopher W, Strassel S, Medero J, et al. ACE multilingual training corpus [J]. Linguistic Data Consortium, 2006, 57: 45.
[9] Shen S, Qi G, Li Z, et al. Hierarchical Chinese legal event extraction via pedal attention mechanism[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2020: 100-113.
[10] Chalkidis I, Androutsopoulos I, Michos A. Extracting contract elements[C]//Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law, 2017: 19-28.
[11] Chalkidis I, Androutsopoulos I. A deep learning approach to contract element extraction [C]//Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2017: 155-164.
[12] Wang Z, Song H, Ren Z, et al. Cross-domain contract element extraction with a bi-directional feedback clause-element relation network[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2021: 1003-1012.
[13] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社,2011: 117-120.
[14] Li L, Zhao L, Nai P, et al. Charge prediction modeling with interpretation enhancement driven by double-layer criminal system[C]//Proceedings of World Wide Web, 2021: 1-20.
[15] Li J, Zhang G, Yan H, et al. A markov logic networks based method to predict judicial decisions of divorce cases[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud, 2018: 129-132.
[16] Shu Y, Zhao Y, Zeng X, et al.Cail2019-fe[R], 2019.
[17] Zhong Haoxi, Xiao Chaojun, Tu Cunchao, et al. How does NLP benefit legal system: A summary of legal artificial intelligence[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 5218-5230.
[18] Kim Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification[C]//Proceedings of of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014: 1746-1751.
[19] Johnson R, Zhang T. Deep pyramid convolutional neural networks for text categorization[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 562-570.
[20] Seo M, Kembhavi A, Farhadi A, et al.Bidirectional attention flow for machine comprehension[C]//Proceddings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
[21] Shao Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, et al. Investigating user behavior in legal case retrieval[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2021: 962-972.
[22] Opijnen M, Santos C. On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2017, 25: 65-87.
[23] Ma Y X, Shao Y Q, Wu Y Y, et al. LeCaRD: A legal case retrieval dataset for Chinese law system[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2021: 2342-2348.
[24] Shao Y, Mao J, Liu Y, et al. BERT-PLI: Modeling paragraph-level interactions for legal case retrieval[C]//Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 3501-3507.
[25] Locke D, Guido Z. A test collection for evaluating legal case law search[C]//Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2018: 1261-1264.
[26] Rabelo J, Kim M Y, Goebel R, et al. COLIEE 2020: Methods for legal document retrieval and entailment[C]//Proceedings of JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 196-210.
[27] Robertson S E, Walker S.Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval[C]//Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 1994: 232-241.
[28] Salton G, Buckley C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1988, 24(5): 513-523.
[29] Tran V, Nguyen M, Satoh K. Building legal case retrieval systems with lexical matching and summarization using a pre-trained phrase scoring model[C]//Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2019: 275-282.
[30] Sugathadasa K, Ayesha B, Silva N, et al. Legal document retrieval using document vector embeddings and deep learning[C]//Processdings of Science and information conference, 2018: 160-175.
[31] Liu B, Wu Y, Liu Y, et al. Conversational vs traditional: Comparing search behavior and outcome in legal case retrieval[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2021: 1622-1626.
[32] Ravichander A, Black A, Wilson S, et al. Question answering for privacy policies: Combining computational and legal perspectives[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2019: 4946-4957.
[33] Kim M, Goebel R, Ken S. COLIEE-2015: Evaluation of legal question answering[C]//Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Juris-informatics, 2015.
[34] Zhong H, Xiao C, Tu C, et al. Jec-qa: A legal-domain question answering dataset[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 9701-9708.
[35] Carvalho, Danilo S, Nguyen M, et al. Lexical-morphological modeling for legal text analysis[C]//Proceedings of JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 2015: 295-311.
[36] Do P, Nguyen H, Tran C, et al. Legal question answering using ranking SVM and deep convolutional neural network [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2017, 1703: 05320.
[37] Kien P M, Nguyen H T, Bach N X, et al. Answering legal questions by learning neural attentive text representation[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2020: 988-998.
[38] Kim M, Xu Y, Goebel R, et al. Answering yes/no questions in legal bar exams[C]//Proceedings of JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 2013: 199-213.
[39] Kim M, Xu Y, Goebel R. A convolutional neural network in legal question answering[C]//Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Juris-informatics, 2015.
[40] Kim M, Goebel R. Two-step cascaded textual entailment for legal bar exam question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 16th Edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law, 2017: 283-290.
[41] Fawei B, Pan J, Kollingbaum M, et al. A methodology for a criminal law and procedure ontology for legal question answering[C]//Proceedings of the Joint International Semantic Technology Conference, 2018: 198-214.
[42] Grover C, Hachey B, Hughson I, et al. Automatic summarisation of legal documents[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003: 243-251.
[43] Farzindar A, Guy L. Legal text summarization by exploration of the thematic structure and argumentative roles[C]//Proceedings of the ACL Text Summarization Branches Out Workshop, 2004: 27-34.
[44] Wagh R, Deepa A. A novel approach of augmenting training data for legal text segmentation by leveraging domain knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,2020: 53-63.
[45] Bhattacharya P, Poddar S, Rudra K, et al. Incorporating domain knowledge for extractive summarization of legal case documents[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2021: 22-31.
[46] Duan X, Zhang Y, Yuan L, et al. Legal summarization for multi-role debate dialogue via controversy focus mining and multi-task learning[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2019: 1361-1370.
[47] Liu C, Chang C, Ho J. Case instance generation and refinement for case-based criminal summary judgments in Chinese [J]. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 2004, 20(4): 783-800.
[48] Luo B, Feng Y, Xu J, et al. Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis[C]//Proceedings of of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2017: 2727-2736.
[49] Chen H, Cai D, Dai W, et al.Charge-based prison term prediction with deep gating network[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2019: 6363-6368.
[50] Zhong H, Guo Z, Tu C, et al. Legal judgment prediction via topological learning[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2018: 3540-3549.
[51] Yang W, Jia W, Zhou X, et al. Legal judgment prediction via multi-perspective bi-feedback network[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 4085-4091.
[52] Yue L, Liu Q, Jin B, et al.NeurJudge: A circumstance-aware neural framework for legal judgment prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2021: 973-982.
[53] Long S, Tu C, Liu Z, et al. Automatic judgment prediction via legal reading comprehension[C]//Proceedings of China National Conference on Chinese Computational Linguistics, 2019: 558-572.
[54] Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preotiuc Pietro D, et al. Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: A natural language processing perspective[J]. PeerJ Computer Science, 2016, 2: e93
[55] Katz D,Bommarito M, Blackman J. A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united States[J].PLoS One, 2017, 12: e0174698.
[56] Liu X, Mou L, Cui H, et al. Jumper: Learning when to make classification decisions in reading[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018: 4237-4243.
[57] Jiang X, Ye H, Luo Z, et al. Interpretable rationale augmented charge prediction system[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, 2018: 146-151.
[58] He C, Li P, Le Y, et al. SECaps: A sequence enhanced capsule model for charge prediction[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2019: 227-239.
[59] Chalkidis I, Fergadiotis T M, Malakasiotis P, et al. LEGAL-BERT: The muppets straight out of law school[G]. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, 2020: 2898-2904.
[60] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2019: 4171-4186.
[61] Xiao C, Hu X, Liu Z, et al. Lawformer: A pre-trained language model for Chinese legal long documents[J]. AI Open, 2021,6: 9-3.
[62] Beltagy I, Peters M E, Cohan A. Longformer: The long-document transformer[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2020, 2004: 05150
[63] Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, et al. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2019, 1907: 11692
[64] Doshi-Velez F, Kortz M, Budish T R, et al.Accountability of AI under the law: The role of explanation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2017, 1711: 01134.
[65] Ma L, Zhang Y, Wang T, et al. Legal judgment prediction with multi-stage case representation learning in the real court setting[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval,2021: 993-1002.
[66] Zhong H, Zhou J, Qu W, et al. An element-aware multi-representation model for law article prediction[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,2020: 6663-6668.
[67] Wang P, Fan Y, Niu S, et al. Hierarchical matching network for crime classification[C]//Proceedings of the 42th International ACM SIGIR Conference, 2019: 325-334.
[68] Xu N, Wang P, Chen L, et al. Distinguish confusing law articles for legal judgment prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2020: 3086-3095.