[1] VAN EEMEREN FH, JACKSON S, JACOBS S. Argumentation[M]//Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer, Cham,2015: 3-25.
[2] FREELEY AJ, STEINBERG DL. Argumentation and debate[M]. Cengage Learning,2013.
[3] BESNARD P, HUNTER A. Elements of argumenta-tion[M].Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.
[4] VAN EEMEREN FH, Grootendorst R, Henkemans AF. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation[M]. Routledge,2002.
[5] EGER S, DAXENBERGER J, GUREVYCH I. Neural end-to-end learning for computational argumentation mining[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2017: 11-22.
[6] WACHSMUTH H, NADERI N, HOU Y, et al. Computational argumentation quality assessment in natural language[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Lin-guistics, 2017: 176-187.
[7] RAHWAN I, SIMARI GR. Argumentation in artificial intelligence[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.
[8] BENCHCAPON TJ, DUNNE PE. Argumentation in artificial intelligence[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2007,171(10-15): 619-641.
[9] ALKHATIB K, WACHSMUTH H, HAGEN M, et al. Crossdomain mining of argumentative text through distant supervision[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech-nologies. 2016: 1395-1404.
[10] PELDSZUS A, STEDEM. Joint prediction in mst-style discourse parsing for argumentation min-ing[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2015: 938-948.
[11] STAB C, GUREVYCH I. Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2014: 46-56.
[12] FENG V W, LIN Z, HIRST G. The impact of deep hier-archical discourse structures in the evaluation of text coherence[C]//Proceedings of COLING, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 2014: 940-949.
[13] WYNER A Z. A functional perspective on argumentation schemes[J]. Argument & Computation, 2016, 7(2-3): 113-133.
[14] TAGHIPOUR K, NG H T. A neural approach to automated essay scoring[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2016: 1882-1891.
[15] MIM F S, INOUE N, REISERT P, et al. Unsupervised learning of discourseaware text representation for essay scoring[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 378-385.
[16] ASTERHAN CS, SCHWARZ BB. The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory[J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007,99(3): 626.
[17] HUNTER A, POLBERG S. Empirical methods for modelling persuadees in dialogical argumentation. [C]//Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2017.
[18] SHIRAFUJI D, RZEPKA R, ARAKI K. Debate outcome prediction using automatic persuasiveness evaluation and counterargument relations[C]//Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Linguistic and Cognitive Approaches To Dialog Agents Workshop LACATODA, 2019.
[19] IMOUSSATEN A, MONTMAIN J, RICO A, et al. A dynamical model for simulating a debate outcome[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, SciTe-Press, 2011: 31-40.
[20] BESNARD P, GARCA A J, HUNTER A, et al. Introduction to structured argumentation[J]. Argument & Computation, 2014, 5(1): 1-4.
[21] COCARASCU O, TONI F. Combining deep learning and argumentative reasoning for the analysis of social media textual content using small data sets[J]. Computational Linguistics, 2018, 44(4): 833-858.
[22] SCHNEIDER J, GROZA T, PASSANT A. A review of argumentation for the social semantic web[J]. Semantic Web. 2013 ,4(2): 159-218.
[23] ALAGOZ E. Social argumentation in online synchronous communication[J]. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 2013,8(4): 399-426.
[24] SARTOR G. Introduction: Judicial applications of artificial intelligence[J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1998, 6(2-4): 105-110.
[25] CARBONELL F. Reasoning by consequences: Applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions[M]. Springer Netherlands, 2013.
[26] MAZZI D. The construction of argumentation in judicial texts: Combining a genre and a corpus perspective[J]. Argumentation, 2007, 21(1): 21-38.
[27] ERDURAN S, JIMNEZALEIXANDRE MP. Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-Based Research[M]. Springer. 2008.
[28] JIMNEZ ALEIXANDRE MP, ERDURAN S. Argumentation in science education: An overview[J]. Argumentation in Science Education. 2007,35: 3-27.
[29] DUSCHL R A, OSBORNE J. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education[J]. Studies in Science Education, 2002, 38(1): 39-72.
[30] MIRZA NM, PERRETCLERMONT AN. Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
[31] BURNSTEIN E, VINOKUR A. Persuasive argumenta-tion and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977 ,13(4): 315-332.
[32] JI L, WEI Z, LI J, et al. Discrete argument representation learning for interactive argument pair identification[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language, 2021: 5467-5478.
[33] YUAN J, WEI Z, GAO Y, et al. Overview of SMP-CAIL2020 Argmine: The interactive argument pair extraction in judgement document challenge[J]. Data Intelligence, 2021: 1-20.
[34] YUAN J, WEI Z, ZHAO D, et al. Leveraging argumentation knowledge graph for interactive argument pair identification[G]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP, 2021: 2310-2319.
[35] DEVLIN J, CHANG M W, LEE K, et al. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Asso-ciation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 4171-4186.
[36] WU Y, LIU P. ACE: A context enhanced model for interactive argument pair identification[C]//Proceedings of the CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. 2021: 569-578.
[37] BAO J, LIANG B, SUN J, et al. Argument pair extraction with mutual guidance and intersentence relation graph[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021: 3923-3934.
[38] CHENG L, BING L, YU Q, et al. APE: Argument pair extraction from peer review and rebuttal via multi-task learning[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2020: 7000-7011.
[39] CHENG L, WU T, BING L, et al. Argument pair extraction via attention-guided multilayer multi-cross encoding[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2021: 6341-6353.
[40] SOMASUNDARAN S, WIEBE J. Recognizing stances in ideological online debates[C]//Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, 2010: 116-124.
[41] HASAN K S, NG V. Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints[C]//Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2013: 1348-1356.
[42] RANADE S, SANGAL R, MAMIDI R. Stance classification in online debates by recognizing users’ intentions[C]//Proceedings of the SIGDIAL Conference, 2013: 61-69.
[43] BARHAIM R, BHATTACHARYA I, DINUZZO F, et al. Stance classification of context-dependent claims[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 2017: 251-261.
[44] WACHSMUTH H, DA SAN MARTINO G, KIESEL D, et al. The impact of modeling overall argumentation with tree kernels[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2017: 2379-2389.
[45] SOBHANI P, MOHAMMAD S, KIRITCHENKO S. Detecting stance in tweets and analyzing its interaction with sentiment[C]//Proceedings of the 5th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 2016: 159-169.
[46] AUGENSTEIN I, ROCKTSCHEL T, VLACHOS A, et al. Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2016: 876-885.
[47] AIOLLI F, DA SAN MARTINO G, SPERDUTI A. Route kernels for trees[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, 2009: 17-24.
[48] KOBBE J, HULPU TEXTCOMMABELOWS I, STUCKENSCHMIDT H. Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2020: 50-60.
[49] WEI P, MAO W. Modeling transferable topics for cross-target stance detection[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2019: 1173-1176.
[50] ZHANG B, YANG M, LI X, et al. Enhancing cross-target stance detection with transferable semantic-emotion knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 3188-3197.
[51] HARDALOV M, ARORA A, NAKOV P, et al. Cross domain label adaptive stance detection[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021: 9011-9028.
[52] PERELMAN C, OLBRECHTSTYTECA L. The New Rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation [M]. Notre Dame University Press, 1969.
[53] CHERSONI E. Manfred stede and jodi schneider: Argumentation mining. synthesis lectures on human language technologies[J]. Lang Resour Eval, 2021, 55(3): 869-871.
[54] RAHIMI Z, LITMAN D J, CORRENTI R, et al. Automatic scoring of an analytical response to text assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2014: 601-610.
[55] TAN C, NICULAE V, DANESCU NICULESCU MIZIL C, et al. Winning Arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2016: 613-624.
[56] WACHSMUTH H, ALKHATIB K, STEIN B. Using argument mining to assess the argumentation quality of essays[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, 2016: 1680-1691.
[57] STAB C, GUREVYCH I. Recognizing insufficiently supported arguments in argumentative essays[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 980-990.
[58] GURCKE T, ALSHOMARY M, WACHSMUTH H. Assessing the sufficiency of arguments through conclusion generation[C]//Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining, 2021: 67-77.
[59] PERSING I, DAVIS A, NG V. Modeling organization in student essays[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2010: 229-239.
[60] PERSING I, NG V. Modeling thesis clarity in student essays[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013: 260-269.
[61] PERSING I, NG V. Modeling prompt adherence in student essays[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014: 1534-1543.
[62] PERSING I, NG V. Modeling argument strength in student essays[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguisticsand the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2015: 543-552,.
[63] ZHANG J, KUMAR R, RAVI S, et al. Conversational flow in Oxford style debates[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2016: 136-141.
[64] WANG L, BEAUCHAMP N, SHUGARS S, et al. Winning on the Merits: The joint effects of content and style on debate outcomes[G]//Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017, 5: 219-232.
[65] HABERNAL I, GUREVYCH I. Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM [C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 1589-1599.
[66] BRAUNSTAIN L, KURLAND O, CARMEL D, et al. Supporting human answers for advice seeking questions in CQA sites[C]//Proceedings of the Euro-pean Conference on Information Retrieval, 2016.
[67] CABRIO E, VILLATA S. Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions [C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics,2012: 208-212.
[68] WACHSMUTH H, STEIN B, AJJOUR Y. “PageRank” for argument relevance [C]//Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 1117-1127.
[69] BOLTUIC＇ F, NAJDER J. Identifying Prominent Arguments in online debates using semantic textual similarity [C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, 2015: 110-115.
[70] DUNG P M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and N-preson games [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995, 77(2): 321-357.
[71] LUKIN S, ANAND P, WALKER M, et al. Argument strength is in the eye of the beholder: Audience effects in persuasion [C]//Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computa-tional Linguistics, 2017: 742-753.
[72] EL BAFF R, WACHSMUTH H, ALKHATIB K, et al. Challenge or empower: Revisiting argumentation quality in a news editorial corpus [C]//Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 2018: 454-464.
[73] Hu M, Liu B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews[C]//Proceedings of the 19th National Confer-ence on Artifical Intelligence, 2004: 755-760.
[74] WANG L, LING W. neural network-based abstract generation for opinions and arguments [C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2016: 47-57.
[75] Li F, Han C, Huang M, et al. Structure-aware review mining and summarization[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010: 653-661.
[76] SYED S, ALKHATIB K, ALSHOMARY M, et al. Generating informative conclusions for argumentative texts[C]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021: 3482-3493.
[77] HUA X, WANG L. Neural argument generation augmented with externally retrieved evidence[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018: 219-230.
[78] ALSHOMARY M, SYED S, POTTHAST M, et al. Argument undermining: Counter-Argument generation by attacking weak premises[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 2661-2672.
[79] HUA X, WANG L. Sentence-level content planning and style specification for neural text generation[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2019: 591-602.
[80] SCHILLER B, DAXENBERGER J, GUREVYCH I. Aspect controlled neural argument generation[C]//Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2021: 380-396.
[81] AL KHATIB K, TRAUTNER L, WACHSMUTH H, et al. Employing argumentation knowledge graphs for neural argument generation[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2021: 4744-4754.
[82] WACHSMUTH H, STEDE M, BAFF R E, et al. Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics,2018: 3753-3765.
[83] IBM Research, Project Debater [CP/OL]. https://research.ibm.com/interactive/project-debater/.[2022-08-24].
[84] SLONIM N, BILU Y, ALZATE C, et al. An autonomous debating system [J]. Nature,2021,591(7850): 379-384.