[1] 图书馆·情报与文献学名词审定委员会. 图书馆·情报与文献学名词 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019:103-358.
[2] SUTTON C, ROHANIMANESH K. MCCALLUM A. Dynamic conditional random fields: Factorized probabilistic models for labeling and segmenting sequence data[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2007, 8(3): 693-723.
[3] GILDEA D, KHUDANPUR S, SARKAR A, et al. A smorgasbord of features for statistical machine translation[C]//Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, 2004: 161-168.
[4] BAHDANAU D, CHO K, BENGIO Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014.
[5] KIM Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP, 2014: 1746-1751.
[6] Alec R, Karthik N, Tim S, Ilya S, et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre training[EB/OL]. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/openai-assets/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf[2022-7-17].
[7] DEVLIN J, CHANG M, LEE K, et al. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of NAACL, 2019: 4171-4186.
[8] LEWIS M, LIU Y, GOYAL N, et al. BART: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2020: 7871-7880.
[9] QIU X, SUN T, XU Y, et al. Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey[J]. Science China. Technological Sciences, 2020, 63(10): 1872-1897.
[10] LIU P, YUAN W, FU J, et al. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Computing Surveys,2023,55(9):1-35.
[11] NING D, YULIN C, XU H, et al. Prompt-learning for Fine-grained entity typing[C]//Proceedings of the EMNLP, 2022: 6888-6901.
[12] LEYANG C, YU W, JIAN L, et al. Template-Based Named Entity Recognition Using BART[C]//Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP, 2021: 1835-1845.
[13] ZHOU X, MA R, GUI T, et al. Plug-tagger: A pluggable sequence labeling framework using language models[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 2110.07331, 2021.
[14] CHEN X, ZHANG N, LI L, et al. LightNER: A lightweight generative framework with prompt-guided attention for low-resource NER[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00720, 2021.
[15] LEE D, KADAKIA A, TAN K, et al. Good examples make a faster learner: Simple demonstration-based learning for low-resource NER[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 2687-2700.
[16] MA R, ZHOU X, GUI T, et al. Template-free prompt tuning for few-shot NER[C]//Proceedings of NAACL, 2022:5721-5732.
[17] ZHOU W, CHEN M. An improved baseline for sentence-level relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of AACL-IJCNLP,2022:161-168.
[18] CHEN X, XIE X, ZHANG N, et al. AdaPrompt: Adaptive prompt-based finetuning for relation extraction[J]. arXiv e-prints, 2021: arXiv: 2104.07650.
[19] CHEN X, LI L, ZHANG N, et al. Relation extraction as open-book examination: Retrieval-enhanced prompt tuning[C]//Proceedings of SIGIR, 2022:2443-2448.
[20] CHIA Y K, BING L, PORIA S, et al. RelationPrompt: Leveraging prompts to generate synthetic data for zero-shot relation triplet extraction[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 45-57.
[21] ZHANG N, LI L, CHEN X, et al. Differentiable prompt makes pre-trained language models better few-shot learners[C]//Proceedings of ICLR, 2022.
[22] YE H, ZHANG N, BI Z, et al. Learning to ask for data-efficient event argument extraction[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022.
[23] HSU I, HUANG K, BOSCHEE E, et al. DEGREE: A data-efficient generative event extraction model[C]//Proceedings of NAACL, 2022:1890-1908.
[24] SI J, PENG X, LI C, et al. Generating disentangled arguments with prompts: A simple event extraction framework that works[C]//Proceedings of ICASSP, 2022: 6342-6346.
[25] LIN J, JIAN J, CHEN Q. Eliciting knowledge from language models for event extraction[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 2109.05190, 2021.
[26] HAN X, ZHAO W, DING N, et al. PTR: Prompt tuning with rules for text classification[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 2105.11259, 2021.
[27] HU S, DING N, WANG H, et al. Knowledgeable prompt-tuning: Incorporating knowledge into prompt verbalizer for text classification[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 2225-2240.
[28] CHEN X, ZHANG N, XIE X, et al. KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware prompt-tuning with synergistic optimization for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference, 2022: 2778-2788.
[29] YE D, LIN Y, LI P, et al. Packed levitated marker for entity and relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 4904-4917.
[30] YE H, ZHANG N, DENG S, et al. Ontology-enhanced prompt-tuning for few-shot learning[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference, 2022: 778-787.
[31] LI X L, LIANG P. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation[C]//Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP, 2021:4582-4597.
[32] SHIN T, RAZEGHI Y, LOGANIV R L, et al. AutoPrompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts[C]//Proceeding of EMNLP,2020:4222-4235.
[33] LIU X, ZHENG Y, DU Z, et al. GPT understands, too[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.10385, 2021.
[34] PETRONI F, ROCKTSCHEL T, LEWIS P, et al.Language models as knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP,2019:2463-2473.
[35] SCHICK T, SCHTZE H. It's not just size that matters: Small language models are also few-shot learners[C]//Proceedings of NAACL,2021:2339-2352.
[36] JIANG Z, XU F, et al.How can we know what language models know[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics,2020, 8: 423-438.
[37] SCHICK T, SCHMID H, SCHTZE H. Automatically identifying words that can serve as labels for few-shot text classification[C]//Proceedings COLING,2020:5569-5578.
[38] BROWN T, MANN B, RYDER N, et al. Language models are few-shot learners[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020, 33: 1877-1901.
[39] LU Y, BARTOLO M, MOORE A, et al. Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 8086-8098.
[40] WANG X, ZHOU K, WEN J, et al. Towards unified conversational recommender systems via knowledge-enhanced prompt learning[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2022: 1929-1937.
[41] RAJAGOPAL D, KHETAN V, SACALEANU B, et al. Cross-domain reasoning via template filling[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 2111.00539, 2021.
[42] ZHAO L, ZHENG F, ZENG W, et al.ADPL: Adversarial prompt-based domain adaptation for dialogue summarization with knowledge disentanglement[C]//Proceedings of SIGIL, 2022:245-255.
[43] TAN Z, ZHANG X, WANG, S, et al.MSP: Multi-stage prompting for making pre-trained language models better translators[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022: 6131-6142.
[44] SCHUCHER N, SIVA R, HARM V.The power of prompt tuning for low-resource semantic parsing[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2022:148-156.
[45] HUANG Z, XU W, YU K. Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 1508.01991, 2015.
[46] REIMERS N, GUREVYCH I. Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP, 2019: 3982-3992.
[47] ZHANG T, KISHORE V, WU F, et al. BERTScore: Evaluating text generation with BERT[C]//Proceedings of ICLR, 2020.
[48] RU C, TANG J, LI S, et al. Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction[J]. Information Processing & Management. 2018, 54(4): 593-608.
[49] GRISHMAN R, WESTBROOK D, MEYERS A. NYU's English ACE system description[EB/OL]. http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/pubs/papers/ACE05-NYUChin-ese.pdf[2022-5-13].
[50] LIN Y, JI H, HUANG F, et al. A joint neural model for information extraction with global features[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2020: 7999-8009.
[51] WADDEN D, WENNBERG U, LUAN Y, et al. Entity, relation, and event extraction with contextualized span representations[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP, 2019: 5784-5789.
[52] LI F, PENG W, CHEN Y, et al. Event extraction as multi-turn question answering[G]//Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, 2020: 829-838.
[53] LIU J, CHEN Y, LIU K, et al. Event extraction as machine reading comprehension [C]//Proceedings of EMNLP, 2020: 1641-1651.
[54] DU X, CARDIE C. Event extraction by answering (Almost) natural questions[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP, 2020:671-683.
[55] PAOLINI G, ATHIWARATKUN B, KRONE J, et al. Structured prediction as translation between augmented natural languages[C]//Proceedings of ICLP,2021:1-26.
[56] LU Y, LIN H, XU J, et al. Text2Event: Controllable sequence-to-structure generation for end-to-end event extraction[C]//Proceedings of ACL, 2021: 2795-2806.
[57] SPEER R, CHIN J, HAVASI C.ConceptNet5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge[C]//Proceedings of AAAI, 2017:4444-4451.
[58] PEDERSEN T, PATWARDHAN S, MICHELIZZI J.WordNet: Similarity—measuring the relatedness of concepts[C]//Proceedings of AAAI, 2004: 25-29.
[59] LIU W, ZHOU P, ZHAO Z, et al. K-BERT: Enabling language representation with knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(03): 2901-2908.
[60] ZHU C, ZENG M. Impossible triangle: What's next for pre-trained language models?[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 2204.06130, 2022.
[61] YU D, ZHU C, YANG Y, et al. JAKET: Joint pre-training of knowledge graph and language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022.
[62] SUN T, SHAO Y, QIU X, et al. CoLAKE: Contextualized language and knowledge embedding[C]//Proceedings of COLING, 2020: 3660-3670.
[63] SHEN T, MAO Y, HE P, et al. Exploiting structured knowledge in text via graph-guided representation learning[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP, 2020: 8980-8994.
[64] LU Y, LIU Q, DAI D, et al. Unified structure generation for universal information extraction[C]//Proceedings of the ACL, 2022: 5755-5772.