基于层次分析法的汉语词汇综合复杂度量化分析

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (1605 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要在国际汉语教学中,词汇综合复杂度的量化研究有利于汉语二语学习者词汇习得顺序的确定,有利于教材编写过程中词汇的选择,有利于教师更加有效地组织课堂教学,最终提高教学效果。该文在对词汇的构词汉字属性、词汇一般属性、词汇统计属性等特征进行分析的基础上,构造了基于层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)的汉语词汇综合复杂度量化模型,并将其应用于所研究词汇综合复杂度的量化分析。通过将实验结果与已有大纲词汇分级一致性的对比分析,验证了该研究词汇综合复杂度量化模型的合理性,为词汇综合复杂度的量化分析提供了定性与定量相结合的分析方案,同时也为词汇分级、文本难度分析、文本简化等提供了借鉴。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张引兵
	宋继华
	彭炜明
	郭冬冬
	宋天宝

关键词 ：词汇综合复杂度, 量化分析, 层次分析法, 一致性分析

Abstract：In the international Chinese language teaching, the quantitative analysis of Chinese vocabulary comprehensive complexity benefit such aspects as the determination of vocabulary acquisition order for Chinese second language learners, the vocabulary selection in the process of textbook compiling, and so on. Based on the analysis of the Chinese character attributes, general attributes and statistical attributes of words, this study constructs a quantitative analysis model of Chinese word difficulty based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP). By comparing the consistency with the vocabulary grading the existing syllabus, the validity of the model is verified. It provides a possible solution to the vocabulary grading, text difficulty analysis and text simplification, etc.

Key words： vocabulary comprehensive complexity quantitative analysis analytic hierarchy process consistencyanalysis

收稿日期: 2019-12-16

中图分类号:

TP391

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(61877004);安徽省高等学校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2019A0592,KJ2020A0023);国家社会科学基金(18ZD295)

作者简介: 张引兵(1979—),博士研究生,主要研究领域为中文信息处理。E-mail:zhangyinbing@mail.bnu.edu.cn
宋继华(1963—),通信作者,教授,博士生导师,主要研究领域为语言信息处理、计算机教育应用。E-mail:songjh@bnu.edu.cn
彭炜明(1985—),博士,讲师,主要研究领域为中文信息处理、词汇语义学。E-mail:pengweiming@bnu.edu.cn

链接本文:

http://jcip.cipsc.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V34/I12/17

[1] Saaty T L. Modeling unstructured decision problems: A theory of analytical hierarchies [C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Mathematical Modeling, University of Missoure Rolla, 1977,1: 59-77.
[2] Saaty T L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1977,15: 234-281.
[3] 沈荣芳.运筹学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2009.
[4] Zhang Y, Song J, Peng W, et al. Construction and analysis of Chinese word-formation knowledge base based on modern Chinese dictionary [C]//Proceedings of the 20th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW2019), 2019: 225-239.
[5] Wilkens R, Vecchia A D, Boito M Z, et al. Size does not matter. Frequency does. A study of features for measuring lexical complexity[C]//Proceedings of the Ibero-American Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Cham, 2014.
[6] Howes D H, Solomon R L. Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability[J]. Journal of Experi-mental Psychology, 1951, 41(6): 401-410.
[7] Besner D, Humphreys G W. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition[J]. American Journal of Psychology, 1991, 106(3): 451-456.
[8] 罗建平.词汇难度分析RANGE32的可靠性考证[J].重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2011(20): 114-115.
[9] Bardel C, Gudmundson A, Lindqvist C. Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learners’ oral production: Vocabulary acquisition and use in L2 French and Italian[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2012,34(2): 269-290.
[10] Kim M, Crossley S A, Kyle K. Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2018, 102: 120-141.
[11] Kyle K, Crossley S A. The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source‐based writing[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2016, 34: 12-24.
[12] 张文忠,吴旭东.课堂环境下二语词汇能力发展的认知心理模式[J].现代外语,2003(04): 373-384.
[13] 李永康,邹白茹.第二语言词汇难度研究的三个维度[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),2004(02): 114-117.
[14] 何志红. 基于数学模型分析的汉语词汇深度研究[D].长沙: 湖南大学硕士学位论文,2013.
[15] O'Regan J K, Jacobs A M. Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992, 18(1): 185-197.
[16] 邢红兵.《(汉语水平)汉字等级大纲》汉字部件统计分析[J].世界汉语教学,2005(02): 49-55.
[17] 郭冬冬.句本位树库构建中的动态词及其结构模式分析[D].北京: 北京师范大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
[18] Guo D, Zhu S, Peng W, et al. Construction of the dynamic word structural mode knowledge base for the international Chinese teaching[C]//Proceedings of the 16th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW2016), 2016: 251-260.
[19] Crossley S A, Cobb T, McNamara D S. Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications[J]. System, 2013, 41: 965-981.
[20] 黄德所,张俊学.层次分析法中特征向量法确定权重向量的理论[C].中国控制与决策学术年会, 1998: 979-882.