用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照

宋丽,刘颖,马艳军

PDF(6971 KB)
PDF(6971 KB)
中文信息学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 163-174.
自然语言处理应用

用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照

  • 宋丽1,刘颖1,马艳军2
作者信息 +

Quantitative Stylistics Perspective to Authorship of Water Margin

  • SONG Li1, LIU Ying1, MA Yanjun2
Author information +
History +

摘要

《水浒传》是独著还是合著、施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。该文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。

Abstract

It is a classical dispute that whether Nai'an Shi authored Water Margin alone, and if he had any partnership with Guanzhong Luo. We first collect the controversies of the authorship of Water Margin and summarize the following five hypotheses: 1. written by Shi alone, 2. written by Luo alone, 3. originally written by Shi and continue to be written by Luo, 4. originally written by Luo and continue to be written by someone else, 5. originally written by Shi and adapted by Luo. Taking Luo's Quelling the Demons' Revolt as a reference, we then investigate the writing style of Water Margin via hypothesis text, text clustering, text classification, rolling stylometry, and text content analysis. The results reveal that the fourth hypothesis is most probably true: the first 70 sections were written by Luo and the rest were written by others.

关键词

水浒传 / 作者身份 / 平妖传 / 计量风格学

Key words

Water Margin / authorship / Quelling the Demons' Revolt / quantitative stylistics

引用本文

导出引用
宋丽,刘颖,马艳军. 用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照. 中文信息学报. 2022, 36(8): 163-174
SONG Li, LIU Ying, MA Yanjun. Quantitative Stylistics Perspective to Authorship of Water Margin. Journal of Chinese Information Processing. 2022, 36(8): 163-174

参考文献

[1] 温庆新. 文献传播学视野下的《水浒传》作者研究[J]. 中国文化研究, 2018(2): 123-132.
[2] 刘冬. 施耐庵探考[M]. 南京: 南京出版社, 1992.
[3] 洪东流. 水浒解密考[M]. 北京: 学林出版社, 2008.
[4] 王晓家.《水浒传》作者考论[M]. 西安: 陕西人民出版社, 1998.
[5] 顾文若, 焦中栋. “施耐庵”为罗贯中之托名[J]. 晋阳学刊, 1999(1): 107-108.
[6] 罗尔纲. 从罗贯中《三遂平妖传》看《水浒传》著者和原本问题[J]. 学术月刊, 1984(10): 22-32.
[7] 吕乃岩. 试说罗贯中续《水浒》[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008(2): 68-76.
[8] 杨林. 罗贯中散论[J]. 海南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1999(3): 15-22.
[9] 欧阳健. 罗贯中研究三题[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 5(5): 104-111.
[10] 李永祜. 施耐庵和罗贯中对《水浒传》成书的贡献[J]. 菏泽学院学报, 2011, 33(4): 24-37.
[11] 马蹄疾. 水浒书录[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1986.
[12] 孙楷第. 日本东京所见小说书目[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1958.
[13] 欧阳健. 《三遂平妖传》原本考辨[J]. 中华文史论丛, 1985(3): 149-165.
[14] 何心. 水浒研究[M]. 上海: 上海文艺联合出版社, 1954.
[15] 茆诗松, 周纪芗. 概率论与数理统计[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2000.
[16] Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variances[J]. Contributions to Probability and Statistics, 1960: 278-292.
[17] Fisher R A. The design of experiments[M]. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd, 1935.
[18] Kruskal W, Wallis W A. Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Associationt, 1952, 47(260): 583-621.
[19] Gibbons J D, Chakraborti S. Nonparametric Statistical Inference[M]. Florida: Taylor and Francis Group, 2011.
[20] Jolliffe I T. Principal Component analysis[M]. New York: Springer Verlag, 1986.
[21] Han J, Kamber M. 数据挖掘: 概念与技术[M]. 范明, 孟小峰, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2008.
[22] 谭红. 《三遂平妖传》世德堂本与嘉会堂本比较研究[D]. 山东: 山东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2013.
[23] Koppel M, Schler J. Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, 2004.
[24] Bevendorff J, Stein B, Hagen M, et al. Generalizing unmasking for short texts[C]//Proceedings of North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 654-659.
[25] 商韬,陈年希. 用《三遂平妖传》不能说明《水浒传》的著者和原本问题——与罗尔纲先生商榷[J]. 学术月刊, 1986(2): 55-59.
[26] Eder M. Rolling stylometry[J]. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2016, 31(3): 457-469.
[27] Markov A A. An example of statistical investigation of the text “Eugene Onegin” concerning the connection of samples in chains[J]. Science in Context, 2006, 19(4): 591-600.
[28] plechcˇ P. Relative contributions of Shakespeare and Fletcher in Henry Ⅷ: An analysis based on most frequent words and most frequent rhythmic patterns[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05652, 2019.
[29] 侯会. 《水浒》源流管窥[J]. 文学遗产, 1986(4): 64-71.
[30] 孟繁仁. “许贯忠”是罗贯中的虚象[J]. 晋阳学刊, 1990(4): 21-29.
[31] 宣啸东. 许贯忠之原型即罗贯中辩[J]. 晋阳学刊, 1991(3): 66-69.
[32] Shapiro S S, Wilk M B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)[J]. Biometrika, 1965, 52(3-4): 591-611.
[33] Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks[J]. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273-297.

基金

教育部社会科学研究一般项目(17YJAZH056);国家社会科学基金(18ZDA238);清华大学人文社科振兴项目(2019THZWJC38);百度网讯科技有限公司项目
PDF(6971 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/